(THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION) Who is Being Censored? Anyone questioning the narrative that there was no early treatment for Covid-19 experienced censorship. Especially doctors. As detailed elsewhere, dissenting doctors in many western countries face threats and suspensions from their employers, medical boards or other authorities – often just for treating patients for Covid-19 with safe drugs. They also got flak. The resulting climate of fear and outrage has led to the formation of doctors resistance groups in Europe, the US, Canada and Australia. Apart from this open conflict, doctors…
Read MoreHopeful Calls to Bury Hcq
When bad headlines about Hcq or Ivm were contrived to appear in the media, quite a few people took advantage to call for such treatments to be stopped. (Stub page)
Read MoreCensorship of Doctors
Censorship of Drs Almost everyone was/is trying to censor Drs over early treatment of Covid-19, especially with hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin.Medical boards and authorities (pharma companies, behind the scenes), medical Journals, mainstream media, social media, science media,Also in on the censoring act were were governments and international institutions.Doctors even censored themselves! A quick look at censorship of Drs in Canada, which provided many of the most extreme examples: “Total mainstream censorship of evidence based science data” Stop press… Dr. Jennifer Hibberd gave a speech at a conference in Ontario in December…
Read MoreSocial Media Censoring Drs
Social Media censoring Drs The general policy of Facebook and major social media on Hcq is illustrated in the storyReport: Facebook Censoring Hydroxychloroquine as Cure, Despite Drug’s Use in Other NationsIt is noteworthy that the widespread (and successful) use of Hcq and Ivm in other countries is never acknowledged by its censors. Doctors censored by social media It is only possible to cover a fraction of the individual covid-censored doctors in any detail.Note that rather than being ‘quacks’ as portrayed, censored Drs tended to be highly qualified, have a big…
Read MoreFlak
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Flak Originating during WWII to describe anti-aircraft fire, the term flak has come to describe written or verbal abuse in discourse. Collins for example describes flak as being hostility in the sense of abuse, censure, or condemnation. One of the keys to understanding covid discourse is recognizing flak – particularly when it is not overt. Why study flak? We’re not going to study it exactly…but flak plays an important role in suppression. It is…
Read MoreThreats+Suspension of Drs
Threats and Suspensions of doctors This page features attacks by the authorities on individual doctors over their use of early treatment, especially hydroxychloroquine.It is an ever-expanding list. For collective resistance, see Doctors Resistance groups Dr Peter McCullough is one of the best known – and best credentialed – critics of the US Covid-19 response, including the refusal to use antivirals like hydroxychloroquine at the early stage of infection, which he aptly terms ‘therapeutic nihilism’. A top cardiologist, he has significantly raised awareness of the risk of myocarditis from the Covid-19…
Read MoreBest Early Treatment Ruses
As noted earlier, for medical authorities to acknowledge the existence of effective early treatments for Covid-19 (such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin) would have precluded the emergency authorisation of the experimental Covid-19 vaccines.Not surprisingly, the determination to deny the incontrovertible evidence on early treatment has led to a variety of rhetorical, and necessarily false, excuses; at first in the media, but soon finding their way into official pronouncements and threats.Naturally, these developments downgrade the doctor-patient relationship. Unapproved. The ‘unapproved’ or ‘unauthorized’ treatment ruse is widely used in western countries to threaten…
Read MoreDoctors Resistance Groups
In the unprecedented ‘western’ crackdown on Covid-19 dissent, doctors were/are being threatened for being true to their Hippocratic oath to first do no harm; for using their own clinical knowledge and judgement; for treating Covid-19 patients early, especially with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and later ivermectin; for commenting honestly on medical evidence; for saving patients’ lives. Even this last statement is not controversial – because remarkably little official interest has been shown in doctors’ actual treatment successes (other than in suppressing them). This renders official claims to be clamping down on doctors…
Read MoreStatements by Doctors
Different headline As the pandemic developed, many doctors treated patients early with hydroxychloroquine, seemingly all with success.As a result there are very many doctors’ statements to be found, to the effect that early treatment for Covid-19 with HCQ is both effective and necessary.Or that antiviral x, y or z is effective for covid when given early.Or “We have treated (a large number) of patients with (a small number) of deaths”(often followed by “We have been banned from social media”). Below is a sample of statements by doctors on early Covid-19…
Read MoreHow HCQ was Scuppered
When <Vladmir Zelenko*> informed Donald Trump of his phenomenal results using Hydroxychloroquine (along with Azithromycin and zinc) to treat early symptoms Covid-19, the stage was set for a dramatic intervention which could and should have altered the course of the pandemic. That this path was averted was down to interventions in the White House – and the rest is politics. (*Sadly Dr Zelenko is no longer with us. An obituary is here) Many of those and subsequent events are detailed elsewhere on the site. However it would be remiss not…
Read More